Psychiatric experience
More than 11 years across inpatient care, outpatient care, addiction treatment, telehealth, geriatric psychiatry, medication management, and clinical leadership.
Behavioral health AI and workflow consulting
Clinical AI and behavioral health workflows shaped by frontline psychiatric experience.
I help behavioral health practices and health technology teams review clinical AI outputs, improve documentation and patient communication workflows, and turn complex psychiatric information into clear, usable tools.
Clinical judgment translated into systems
A bridge between clinical care, product design, operations, and communication
Workflow experience
Direct experience with documentation quality, patient intake, communication systems, practice operations, digital tools, and clinician guided automation.
Clear evidence standards
Recommendations distinguish observed problems, reasonable inferences, unresolved questions, and claims that require stronger evidence.
Problems worth reviewing
Polished output can still conceal clinical weakness.
A useful review asks whether the system preserves clinically important information, communicates uncertainty, supports the intended decision, and gives people a clear path to human intervention.
Accurate language with missing substance
Notes, summaries, prompts, and patient messages may sound professional while omitting risk factors, context, competing explanations, or essential follow up.
Information collected without a useful result
Intake and documentation systems can create more data while failing to improve the clinical summary, handoff, decision, or next action.
Words that send the wrong signal
Patient education and staff guidance can be technically correct yet overly reassuring, unnecessarily alarming, vague about uncertainty, or unclear about escalation.
Founding offer
Behavioral Health AI and Workflow Review
A fixed scope review for a behavioral health practice, telepsychiatry organization, EHR vendor, documentation company, patient engagement platform, or clinical AI team.
One defined body of material
Submit up to 20 deidentified AI outputs, one defined clinical workflow, or one prompt, template, or knowledge base set.
Six review dimensions
- Clinical accuracy and important omissions
- Unsupported conclusions and internal contradictions
- Risk language and escalation pathways
- Documentation usefulness and clinician usability
- Patient readability and communication quality
- Scope boundaries and foreseeable failure modes
Actionable findings
- A concise risk matrix
- Annotated findings on the submitted material
- Revisions to two priority prompts or templates
- A ranked improvement plan
- A thirty day implementation roadmap
- A forty five minute review meeting
- One round of written clarification
Founding pilot fee
$1,500
The founding fee applies to the first three completed pilot engagements. Delivery is normally seven business days after complete materials are received. Scope and timing are confirmed in writing before work begins.
Request a pilot discussionProcess
A small engagement with a concrete decision at the end.
Define the decision
Clarify what is creating concern, who uses the material, what decision the review must support, and what would make the engagement useful.
Review the evidence
Examine the submitted material against clinical purpose, internal consistency, risk, usability, communication quality, and stated system boundaries.
Prioritize the changes
Deliver a ranked set of corrections, revised priority material, and an implementation sequence that separates urgent risk from later optimization.
Boundaries
Clinical review without inflated promises
Pilot materials should be deidentified unless appropriate contracts and secure data handling arrangements are in place. The review provides clinical and operational analysis. It is not legal advice, regulatory certification, or a guarantee that a system is safe, compliant, or ready for independent clinical use.
The written scope defines the submitted material, deliverables, revision limit, confidentiality terms, ownership, payment schedule, and intended use.
A clinical tool should make the important information easier to see, not merely make the output easier to read.
Professional, media, speaking, and consulting inquiries may be sent by email. Do not include patient information, treatment records, or urgent clinical questions.